Import with a buyer brief
A list is easier to review when every row is checked against the same plain-English target buyer.
- Campaign context is clear
- Required columns are understood
- Weak rows are not hidden
- Reviewer owns the final decision
CSV lead review
Meetlane turns an imported list into a review board: accepted rows, skipped rows, research gaps, contact readiness, angle checks, and export decisions. The point is not to make every row look ready. The point is to make the next step clear.
What to review
Good CSV review separates imported facts from reviewer decisions. Fit, research gaps, contact readiness, angle quality, and export readiness all need their own state.
A list is easier to review when every row is checked against the same plain-English target buyer.
Messy CSVs should show what was accepted, what was skipped, and what still needs cleanup.
A row can look useful while the person, account, timing, or contact state still needs review.
Company research should support a decision, not create another pile of unreviewed facts.
Only rows with a clear next step should move toward contact unlock, draft review, or export.
CSV cleanup should lead to better angle review, not a message based on unsupported imported fields.
Reviewer decisions
Meetlane keeps CSV cleanup grounded in states a reviewer can act on: accept, flag, lock, export, or leave the row out of the current campaign.
The row has enough fit and context to enter lead review, even if contact readiness still needs work.
The row might be useful, but missing context should be fixed before the reviewer acts on it.
The lead can stay in the campaign while contact details remain locked or unresolved.
The next workflow receives only rows with a clear reviewed state and no hidden blockers.
Before export
Use the list to start review, then decide which rows deserve more research, which contacts stay locked, which angles are supported, and which rows are ready to leave Meetlane.
See lead review